Editorial standards
Methodology and Evidence Standards
Persuasion is most durable when readers can inspect the evidence, identify the assumptions, and disagree without being misrepresented.
State the position
The site argues that Islam is not divinely revealed. That conclusion is disclosed rather than hidden behind claims of neutrality.
Use internal critique
Arguments should begin with Islamic texts, doctrines, or historical claims before importing outside theological assumptions.
Steelman responses
A recognizable Muslim scholar should be able to identify the response section as a serious version of the position.
Separate text from inference
A linked verse or hadith verifies what a source says. It does not, by itself, verify the site's interpretation.
Prefer primary and academic sources
Popular apologetics can point toward an argument, but disputed historical claims should ultimately rest on primary texts and relevant scholarship.
Grade confidence
Strong, contested, mixed, and worldview-dependent arguments are labeled differently. A cumulative case should not conceal its weaker components.
Correct publicly
Material corrections are recorded with the date, affected page, change, and reason.
Current audit status
Quran and major hadith references are automatically linked. Claim-level editions, page numbers, quotations, scholarly perspectives, and publication metadata are still being audited. Pages expose that gap rather than presenting it as completed work.